This page contains information for those instances when: 1) UTHSCSA is the prime submitter and has subawards to other institutions, or 2) when another institution is the prime submitter and UTHSCSA will be a subaward on the project. Detailed instructions can be found here for both Cayuse and non-Cayuse submissions.
NEW! Beginning in September 2016, UTHSCSA has joined the FDP Expanded Clearinghouse Pilot, which reduces the paperwork burden for subawards with fellow Pilot Participants (which includes a number of UTHSCSA's regular collaborators) by providing a central repository of information to eliminate lengthy subrecipient forms. This is applicable both when UTHSCSA is the prime submitted, and the subawardee.
When planning for a subaward in either scenario, it is essential to first determine whether the collaborating institution is also a Pilot Participant. If so, the required paperwork at the proposal stage will be minimal, though please understand there will still be certain documentation required in all cases, such as a budget/justification and a statement of work.
This change will be most apparent in the signature document. For fellow Pilot Participants, no more than a short version of the subrecipient form should be used, which requests only minimal, project-specific details. For non-Pilot institutions, a longer version of the subrecipient form will generally be needed, which collects both project-specific and general institutional details and certifications. Each institution is likely to have their own specific form they require; be sure to provide the correct version to the subawardee (when UTHSCSA is the prime submitting institution), or obtain the correct version from the prime institution (when UTHSCSA is the subawardee).
Read more detailed information about the Pilot in OSP's listserv announcement here
When HSC is the Prime Submitting Institution:
In general, when UTHSCSA submits a grant proposal that includes one or more subaward(s) to other institution(s), OSP requires certain documentation from the subawardee at the time of proposal submission. The format that should be used to submit such items depends on a several factors.
- For Pilot Participants: Shortened Signature Page
- For non-Pilot Institutions: Intent to Establish a Subrecipient Agreement
When HSC is the Subawardee:
Likewise, when the situation is reversed and another institution is submitting the prime proposal to include a subaward to UTHSCSA, there are some important questions to ask to be sure we are providing documentation to the other institution in an acceptable format.
All subaward proposals must be reviewed and approved by OSP prior to submission to the prime institution. OSP requires the following documentation when processing a subaward proposal:
- Certificate of Proposal (COP)
- Statement of Work to briefly describe HSC’s role on the overall project
- Any documentation requested by the prime institution, such as a face page to be signed by our office, budget/budget justification, etc.
Be sure to find out the prime institution’s deadline for receipt of HSC’s documentation. Internal deadlines vary by institution with the majority requiring at least 3-5 business days prior to their main proposal deadline.
Revised September 2016